← CABF Ballot Browser
Ballot-192
passed
Ballot 192 – Notary Revision
Server Certificate Working Group
Key dates
- Effective date
- 28 Jun 2017 8 years ago
- Voting opened
- 21 Jun 2017 9 years ago
- Voting closed
- 28 Jun 2017 8 years ago
- Discussion opened
- 15 Jun 2017 9 years ago
- Discussion closed
- 21 Jun 2017 9 years ago
AI Summary
Ballot overview
- Ballot 192, Notary Revision, was a Server Certificate Working Group ballot.
- The ballot passed.
- The motion revised section 11.11.1(A)(ii) in the Verified Legal Opinion requirements.
What changed
- The ballot removed the requirement that a Latin Notary be a member of the International Union of Latin Notaries in order to provide the relevant legal opinion.
- The revised motion states that the CA must verify the legal opinion is authored by an independent legal practitioner who is either:
- a lawyer or equivalent licensed to practice in the relevant jurisdiction, or
- a notary that is a member of the International Union of Latin Notaries and is a Latin Notary currently commissioned or licensed to practice in the relevant jurisdiction, with that jurisdiction recognizing the role of the Latin Notary.
- The ballot text says this change allows a broader set of Latin Notaries to provide the legal opinion required by the EV Guidelines.
Voting result and approval conditions
- Voting by CAs: 9 yes, 0 no, 1 abstain.
- Voting by browsers: 2 yes, 0 no, 0 abstain.
- Quorum was met.
- The two-thirds CA vote requirement and the 50%-plus-one browser vote requirement were met.
- At least one CA member and one browser member voted in favor.
Timing
- Discussion period: 2017-06-15 to 2017-06-21.
- Voting period: 2017-06-21 to 2017-06-28.
- The motion text says the change is effective immediately.
- Effective date
- 2017-06-28
- Voting opened
- 2017-06-21
- Voting closed
- 2017-06-28
- Discussion opened
- 2017-06-15
- Discussion closed
- 2017-06-21
Applicability and conditions
2017-06-28 — Apply the revised Verified Legal Opinion requirement; the motion text says the change is effective immediately. All CAs covered by the ballot
AI-generated from the CABF ballot page. The official CABF article remains the authoritative source.
Proposers
Jeremy Rowley of DigiCert and endorsed by Kirk Hall of Entrust and Rich Smith of Comodo.
Excerpt
SearchHome » All CA/Browser Forum Posts » Ballot 192 – Notary RevisionBallot 192 – Notary RevisionResults on Ballot 192 – Notary Revision The voting period for Ballot 192 has ended. The ballot has passed. Here are the results.
View on cabforum.org →
Last fetched 16 hours ago