← CABF Ballot Browser
Ballot-30 failed

Ballot 30 – Reserved Domain Names

Server Certificate Working Group

Key dates

Voting opened
31 Jul 2009 16 years ago
Voting closed
07 Aug 2009 16 years ago
Discussion opened
24 Jul 2009 16 years ago
Discussion closed
31 Jul 2009 16 years ago

AI Summary

Generated 2026-06-23 21:39 UTC

Ballot overview

  • Ballot 30 – Reserved Domain Names in the Server Certificate Working Group.
  • The ballot page is marked Failed.
  • The motion proposed errata to the Guidelines, including changes to domain name certificate requirements, EV certificate use obligations, and WHOIS-based domain verification.

Proposed changes

  • Section 6(a)(2) would be replaced to require at least one subjectAlternativeName:dNSName entry associated with the subject’s server(s).
  • Each dNSName entry would have to be a fully qualified domain name verified under Section 18.
  • The asterisk wildcard character would not be allowed.
  • The subject commonName field would be optional but recommended, limited to one instance, and if present would have to match a verified fully qualified domain name in a subjectAlternativeName:dNSName field.
  • Section 12(b)(4) would be replaced to add EV Certificate use obligations, including installation only on server(s) accessible at a listed domain name and use only in compliance with applicable laws, authorized company business, and the Subscriber Agreement.
  • Section 18(b)(1)(A) would be replaced to allow WHOIS inquiry or contact with the domain registrar, with a response indicating the applicant or a parent/subsidiary company is the registered entity.

Dates stated in the ballot

  • The review period would begin at 2100 UTC on 24 July 2009 and close at 2100 UTC on 31 July 2009.
  • If not withdrawn during review, voting would start immediately afterward and close at 2100 UTC on 7 Aug 2009.
  • The motion said the Guidelines would be amended effective 90 days following ratification of the ballot.

Outcome

  • The ballot page explicitly labels the ballot as Failed, so it never became normative.
  • No compliance date is applicable because the ballot failed.
Model: gpt-5.4-mini Confidence: 0.99 Result: failed
Voting opened
2009-07-31
Voting closed
2009-08-07
Discussion opened
2009-07-24
Discussion closed
2009-07-31

AI-generated from the CABF ballot page. The official CABF article remains the authoritative source.

Excerpt

SearchHome » All CA/Browser Forum Posts » Ballot 30 – Reserved Domain NamesBallot 30 – Reserved Domain NamesBallot 30 – Reserved Domain Names (Failed)

View on cabforum.org → Last fetched 16 hours ago

We use only essential cookies and local browser storage for preferences and security. See our Privacy Policy for details.

Confirm action