← CABF Ballot Browser
Ballot-89 passed

Ballot 89 – Publish Recommendations for the Processing of EV SSL Certificates v.2(passes)

Server Certificate Working Group

Key dates

Effective date
17 Jan 2014 12 years ago
Voting opened
10 Jan 2014 12 years ago
Voting closed
17 Jan 2014 12 years ago
Discussion opened
03 Jan 2014 12 years ago
Discussion closed
10 Jan 2014 12 years ago

Resources

AI Summary

Generated 2026-06-23 21:35 UTC

Ballot overview

  • Ballot 89 authorizes publication of Recommendations for the Processing of Extended Validation SSL Certificates, v. 2.0.
  • The ballot page states that voting on Ballot 89 closed and that Ballot 89 passes.
  • The motion says the words Proposed Draft will be removed from the document on the CA/Browser Forum website upon adoption.

Timing stated in the evidence

  • The ballot review period comes into effect on 3 January 2014 at 2100 UTC.
  • The ballot review period closes on 10 January 2014 at 2100 UTC.
  • The voting period starts immediately after the review period and closes on 17 January 2014 at 2100 UTC.
  • The linked PDF is dated January 2, 2014 and is version 2.0.

What the recommendations cover

  • The document gives recommendations for application software suppliers that process or display EV certificates.
  • It describes how root store managers should identify EV CSPs and EV certificates.
  • It recommends notification, agreement, process description, communication, schedule, membership posting, and software verification steps for root-embedding programs.
  • It recommends protection of CSP public-key integrity.
  • It requires certificate verification software to validate certificates under RFC 5280 Section 6.
  • It says user agents must not grant EV treatment when path validation fails or when an EV certificate is known to be revoked.
  • It says certificate verification software must verify the EV policy identifier and support revocation checking using CRL and OCSP.
  • It includes guidance on certificate contents, cryptographic algorithms and minimum key sizes, and EV treatment behavior.
  • It also includes security considerations and text equivalents for EV OIDs in subject distinguished name fields.

Ballot result details

  • Ten members voted in favor: Buypass, Comodo, D-TRUST, DigiCert, GoDaddy, Izenpe, SSC, Symantec, Trend Micro, and Opera.
  • Mozilla abstained.
  • There were none opposed.
  • The page states that Ballot 89 passes.
Model: gpt-5.4-mini Confidence: 0.95 Result: passed
Effective date
2014-01-17
Voting opened
2014-01-10
Voting closed
2014-01-17

AI-generated from the CABF ballot page. The official CABF article remains the authoritative source.

Excerpt

SearchHome » All CA/Browser Forum Posts » Ballot 89 – Publish Recommendations for the Processing of EV SSL Certificates v.2(passes)Ballot 89 – Publish Recommendations for the Processing of EV SSL Certificates v.2(passes)Voting on Ballot 89 closed. Ten voted in favor – Buypass, Comodo, D-TRUST, DigiCert, GoDaddy, Izenpe, SSC, Symantec, Trend Micro, and Opera. Mozilla abstained. There were none opposed. Therefore, Ballot 89 passes.

View on cabforum.org → Last fetched 16 hours ago

We use only essential cookies and local browser storage for preferences and security. See our Privacy Policy for details.

Confirm action