← CABF Ballot Browser
SC-006 failed

Ballot SC006: Revocation Timeline Extension

Server Certificate Working Group

Key dates

Effective date
14 Sep 2018 7 years ago
Voting opened
07 Sep 2018 7 years ago
Voting closed
14 Sep 2018 7 years ago
Discussion opened
31 Aug 2018 7 years ago
Discussion closed
07 Sep 2018 7 years ago

Resources

AI Summary

Generated 2026-06-23 21:42 UTC

Ballot overview

  • Ballot SC006, Revocation Timeline Extension, was proposed as a Final Maintenance Guideline for the Baseline Requirements.
  • The ballot passed.
  • Voting by CAs: 23 yes votes, 0 no votes, 0 abstentions.
  • Voting by browsers: 5 yes votes, 0 no votes, 0 abstentions.
  • The page states quorum was met and the approval requirements were met for both CAs and browsers.

Main changes

  • Revises the definition of Key Compromise to mean a private key is compromised if its value has been disclosed to an unauthorized person or an unauthorized person has had access to it.
  • Rewrites Section 4.9.1.1 to create a tiered revocation timeline for subscriber certificates.
  • Requires revocation within 24 hours for certain cases, including:
    • Subscriber requests revocation in writing
    • Subscriber says the original certificate request was not authorized and does not retroactively grant authorization
    • Evidence of subscriber private key compromise
    • Evidence that validation of domain authorization or control for a FQDN or IP address in the certificate should not be relied upon
  • For other listed cases, the CA should revoke within 24 hours and must revoke within 5 days.
  • Revises Section 4.9.1.2 so subordinate CA certificates must be revoked within 7 days for listed causes.
  • Requires CAs to provide a process for subscribers to request revocation of their own certificates and to maintain a continuous 24x7 ability to accept and respond to revocation requests and certificate problem reports.
  • Requires public disclosure of instructions for reporting suspected private key compromise, certificate misuse, fraud, compromise, misuse, inappropriate conduct, or other certificate-related matters, including in CPS section 1.5.2.
  • Requires the CA, within 24 hours after receiving a certificate problem report, to investigate and provide a preliminary report to both the subscriber and the reporting entity.
  • Requires the CA to work with the subscriber and reporter to establish whether the certificate will be revoked and, if so, the revocation date.
  • States that the time from receipt of the problem report or revocation-related notice to published revocation must not exceed the time frame in Section 4.9.1.1.

Dates

  • Discussion period: 2018-08-31 20:00 UTC to 2018-09-07 20:00 UTC
  • Voting period: 2018-09-07 20:00 UTC to 2018-09-14 20:00 UTC
  • The ballot page does not state an IPR end date.
  • The ballot page does not state a separate effective date.
  • The ballot text includes revocation timelines of 24 hours, 5 days, and 7 days for the applicable certificate types and conditions.

Outcome

  • The ballot passed and became normative based on the evidence provided.
Model: gpt-5.4-mini Confidence: 0.98 Result: passed
Effective date
2018-09-14
Voting opened
2018-09-07
Voting closed
2018-09-14
Discussion opened
2018-08-31
Discussion closed
2018-09-07
Applicability and conditions

2018-09-14 — CAs must revoke within 24 hours for the listed immediate cases, or within 5 days for the listed SHOULD/MUST cases Subscriber certificates, for the revocation cases listed in Section 4.9.1.1

2018-09-14 — Issuing CAs must revoke within 7 days for the listed subordinate CA revocation cases Subordinate CA certificates, for the revocation cases listed in Section 4.9.1.2

AI-generated from the CABF ballot page. The official CABF article remains the authoritative source.

Proposers

Wayne Thayer of Mozilla and endorsed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and Dimitris Zacharopoulos of Harica.

Excerpt

SearchHome » All CA/Browser Forum Posts » Ballot SC006: Revocation Timeline ExtensionBallot SC006: Revocation Timeline ExtensionVoting by CAs – 23 votes total including abstentions

View on cabforum.org → Last fetched 15 hours ago

We use only essential cookies and local browser storage for preferences and security. See our Privacy Policy for details.

Confirm action