← CABF Ballot Browser
SC-058 passed

Ballot SC058: Require distributionPoint in sharded CRLs

Server Certificate Working Group

Key dates

Voting opened
31 Oct 2022 3 years ago
Voting closed
07 Nov 2022 3 years ago
Discussion opened
22 Oct 2022 3 years ago
Discussion closed
29 Oct 2022 3 years ago

AI Summary

Generated 2026-06-23 21:40 UTC

Ballot overview

  • Ballot SC058 proposes a modification to the Baseline Requirements (Version 1.8.4) to ensure that all sharded CRLs contain the distributionPoint field.
  • The ballot states that RFC 5280’s language does not actually require the presence of the distributionPoint field, and the ballot augments the Baseline Requirements’ CRL Profile accordingly.

Motion and scope

  • The ballot modifies the Baseline Requirements for the issuance and management of publicly-trusted certificates, based on Version 1.8.4.
  • The ballot is described as a Final Maintenance Guideline.

Voting outcome

  • Certificate Issuers: 19 votes total; 19 YES; 0 NO; 0 ABSTAIN.
  • Certificate Consumers: 3 votes total; 3 YES; 0 NO; 0 ABSTAIN.
  • Bylaws requirements were reported as MET for both Certificate Issuers and Certificate Consumers.
  • Quorum requirement was reported as MET.

Effective requirement (as reflected in linked artifact text)

  • The linked artifact text adds a requirement that sharded or partitioned CRLs MUST have a distributionPoint.
  • The linked artifact text also states: Effective 2023-01-15, if a CRL does not contain entries for all revoked unexpired certificates issued by the CRL issuer, then it MUST contain a critical Issuing Distribution Point extension and MUST populate the distributionPoint field of that extension.
Model: gpt-5.4-nano Confidence: 0.86 Result: passed
Voting opened
2022-10-31
Voting closed
2022-11-07
Discussion opened
2022-10-22
Discussion closed
2022-10-29
Applicability and conditions

2023-01-15 — The CRL MUST contain a critical Issuing Distribution Point extension and MUST populate the distributionPoint field of that extension. If a CRL does not contain entries for all revoked unexpired certificates issued by the CRL issuer

AI-generated from the CABF ballot page. The official CABF article remains the authoritative source.

Vote result

Certificate Issuers 19 yes 0 no 0 abstain
Certificate Consumers 3 yes 0 no 0 abstain

CABF ballot approval depends on both voting classes; CA votes alone are not decisive.

22 Yes
0 No
0 Abstain

100% yes · 0% no

Proposers

Aaron Gable of ISRG / Let’s Encrypt, and endorsed by Clint Wilson of Apple, Corey Bonnell of DigiCert, and Dmitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA.

Excerpt

SearchHome » All CA/Browser Forum Posts » Ballot SC058: Require distributionPoint in sharded CRLsBallot SC058: Require distributionPoint in sharded CRLsVoting Results Certificate Issuers 19 votes total, with no abstentions:

View on cabforum.org → Last fetched 16 hours ago

We use only essential cookies and local browser storage for preferences and security. See our Privacy Policy for details.

Confirm action