← CABF Ballot Browser
SC-069
passed
Ballot SC069: Clarify router and firewall logging requirements
Server Certificate Working Group
Key dates
- Effective date
- 15 Apr 2024 2 years ago
- Voting opened
- 26 Feb 2024 2 years ago
- Voting closed
- 04 Mar 2024 2 years ago
- IPR review ends
- 13 Apr 2024 2 years ago
- Discussion opened
- 26 Feb 2024 2 years ago
- Discussion closed
- 04 Mar 2024 2 years ago
Resources
GitHub diff
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/41f01640748fa612386f8b1a3031cd1bff3d4f35...d5bd141e14de098ff00c10de7cf500668cbc6843
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/41f01640748fa612386f8b1a3031cd1bff3d4f35...d5bd141e14de098ff00c10de7cf500668cbc6843
Redline
https://cabforum.org/2024/03/12/ballot-sc069-clarify-router-and-firewall-logging-requirements/BR-redlined.pdf
TLS-BRs-redlined.pdf
Document
https://cabforum.org/2024/03/12/ballot-sc069-clarify-router-and-firewall-logging-requirements/BR.pdf
TLS-BRs
Document
https://cabforum.org/2024/03/12/ballot-sc069-clarify-router-and-firewall-logging-requirements/BR.docx
TLS-BRs.docx
Document
https://cabforum.org/uploads/CABF-IPR-Policy-v.1.3_4APR18.pdf
CA/Browser Forum Intellectual Property Rights Policy
AI Summary
Ballot overview
- Ballot SC069, Clarify router and firewall logging requirements, is a Final Maintenance Guideline for the TLS Baseline Requirements.
- The ballot aims to clarify what data needs to be logged under the Firewall and router activities logging requirement.
- It modifies the Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted TLS Server Certificates, based on Version 2.0.2.
Voting and adoption
- Voting results: 26 issuer votes yes, 0 no, 0 abstain.
- Voting results: 2 consumer votes yes, 0 no, 0 abstain.
- Bylaw 2.3(6) requirements were met for issuer, consumer, and category participation thresholds.
- Quorum was 16 and this requirement was met.
- The ballot page states that the ballot was adopted.
IPR review
- Start of Review Period: 13 March 2024 at 18:00 UTC.
- End of Review Period: 13 April 2024 at 18:00 UTC.
- The evidence includes the IPR policy and exclusion notice template, but it does not explicitly state whether any exclusion notices were filed for this ballot.
Normative change
- Section 5.4.1 was changed so the CA must record relevant router and firewall activities, as described in Section 5.4.1.1.
- Log records must include at least:
- Date and time of event
- Identity of the person making the journal record, when applicable
- Description of the event
- A new Section 5.4.1.1 was added for router and firewall activities logs.
- Logging of router and firewall activities necessary to meet Section 5.4.1, Subsection 3.6 must at a minimum include:
- Successful and unsuccessful login attempts to routers and firewalls
- All administrative actions on routers and firewalls, including configuration changes, firmware updates, and access control modifications
- All changes to firewall rules, including additions, modifications, and deletions
- All system events and errors, including hardware failures, software crashes, and system restarts
Effective date
- The redline artifact lists the ballot as SC69 with an effective date of 15-April-2024 in the revisions table.
- The ballot page also shows the document version as 15-April-2024.
- This is the compliance date for the adopted logging changes.
- Effective date
- 2024-04-15
- Voting opened
- 2024-02-26
- Voting closed
- 2024-03-04
- IPR review ends
- 2024-04-13
- Discussion opened
- 2024-02-26
- Discussion closed
- 2024-03-04
AI-generated from the CABF ballot page. The official CABF article remains the authoritative source.
Vote result
Certificate Issuers
26 yes
0 no
0 abstain
Certificate Consumers
2 yes
0 no
0 abstain
28
Yes
0
No
0
Abstain
Proposers
Martijn Katerbarg (Sectigo) and endorsed by Daniel Jeffery (Fastly) and Ben Wilson (Mozilla).
Excerpt
SearchHome » All CA/Browser Forum Posts » Ballot SC069: Clarify router and firewall logging requirementsBallot SC069: Clarify router and firewall logging requirementsVoting Results Certificate Issuers 26 votes total, with no abstentions:
View on cabforum.org →
Last fetched 16 hours ago