← CABF Ballot Browser
SC-099
passed
Ballot SC099: Improve Recording of Validation Method
Server Certificate Working Group
Key dates
- Effective date
- 15 Jul 2026 2 weeks from now
- Voting opened
- 10 Apr 2026 2 months ago
- Voting closed
- 17 Apr 2026 2 months ago
- Discussion opened
- 03 Apr 2026 2 months ago
- Discussion closed
- 10 Apr 2026 2 months ago
Resources
GitHub diff
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/168e0aa8cafe753c85a94b5a8f28541beda48201...e3fc28ab09ffae2f83aa9316ff20108199c29692
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/168e0aa8cafe753c85a94b5a8f28541beda48201...e3fc28ab09ffae2f83aa9316ff20108199c29692
Redline
https://cabforum.org/2026/04/18/ballot-sc099-improve-recording-of-validation-method/BR-SC099-redline.pdf
TBR-SC99-redlined.pdf
Redline
https://cabforum.org/2026/04/18/ballot-sc099-improve-recording-of-validation-method/BR-SC099-redline.docx
TBR-SC99-redlined.docx
Document
https://cabforum.org/2026/04/18/ballot-sc099-improve-recording-of-validation-method/BR-SC099.pdf
TBR-SC99.pdf
Document
https://cabforum.org/2026/04/18/ballot-sc099-improve-recording-of-validation-method/BR-SC099.docx
TBR-SC99.docx
Document
https://cabforum.org/wp-content/uploads/Template-for-Exclusion-Notice.pdf
https://cabforum.org/wp-content/uploads/Template-for-Exclusion-Notice.pdf
AI Summary
Ballot overview (SC-099)
- Code: SC-099
- Title: Improve Recording of Validation Method
- Working group: Server Certificate Working Group
- Purpose:
- Remove ambiguous language in Sections 3.2.2.4 and 3.2.2.5 that required CAs to record the relevant BR version number when performing validation.
- Replace it with unambiguous language in Section 5.4.1 requiring CAs to audit log the information being validated and the validation method used.
- Effective date stated in the ballot text: July 15, 2026.
What changes in requirements
- Removes requirements to maintain a record of the relevant BR version number used for validation.
- Updates audit logging so that, effective 2026-07-15, records MUST include at a minimum:
- the information being validated (for example, the applied-for FQDN or the organization name)
- the ADN used (if applicable and different from the applied-for FQDN)
- the validation method used (for example, the BRs section number or the registered label of an ACME validation method)
Voting and adoption
- Voting results shown on the ballot page:
- 29 voting YES, 0 voting NO, 0 ABSTAIN (29 votes in total)
- Bylaws requirements:
- Bylaw 2.3(6) adoption thresholds were MET for both Certificate Issuers and Certificate Consumers.
- Bylaw 2.3(7) quorum requirement was MET (quorum was 15 for this ballot).
- Effective date
- 2026-07-15
- Voting opened
- 2026-04-10
- Voting closed
- 2026-04-17
- Discussion opened
- 2026-04-03
- Discussion closed
- 2026-04-10
AI-generated from the CABF ballot page. The official CABF article remains the authoritative source.
Vote result
Certificate Issuers
29 yes
0 no
0 abstain
Certificate Consumers
4 yes
0 no
0 abstain
33
Yes
0
No
0
Abstain
Excerpt
SearchHome » All CA/Browser Forum Posts » Ballot SC099: Improve Recording of Validation MethodBallot SC099: Improve Recording of Validation MethodVoting Results Certificate Issuers 29 votes in total:
View on cabforum.org →
Last fetched 16 hours ago