← CABF Ballot Browser
SMC-012 passed

Ballot SMC012: Introduce ACME for S/MIME

S/MIME Certificate Working Group

Key dates

Voting opened
26 May 2025 1 year ago
Voting closed
02 Jun 2025 1 year ago
IPR review ends
02 Jul 2025 11 months ago
Discussion opened
19 May 2025 1 year ago
Discussion closed
26 May 2025 1 year ago

Resources

AI Summary

Generated 2026-06-23 21:40 UTC

Result

  • Ballot SMC012: Introduce ACME for S/MIME was adopted as of July 2, 2025.
  • The voting period completed with the ballot marked PASSED.
  • No IPR Exclusion Notices were filed.

What the ballot does

  • Introduces a new method for validation of mailbox control using ACME for S/MIME as defined in RFC 8823.
  • Describes how a CA’s ACME server may respond to a POST request by sending Random Value token components via email and SMTP, then receiving a confirming response using the generated Random Value.
  • Adds requirements for Random Value generation, sharing, non-reuse, and validity window (no more than 24 hours from creation), with the CA allowed to specify a shorter validity period.
  • Notes that implementations MAY use ACME External Account Binding as defined in RFC 8555.
  • Includes minor typographic corrections, including clarification in section 7.1.4.2.1 regarding the use of directoryName in the SAN extension.

Voting and adoption checks (Bylaws)

  • Bylaw 2.3(6): Certificate Issuer category requirement was MET.
  • Bylaw 2.3(6): Certificate Consumer category requirement was MET.
  • Bylaw 2.3(6): At least one Voting Member in each category voted in favour was MET.
  • Bylaw 2.3(7): Quorum requirement was MET (quorum was 11 for this ballot).
Model: gpt-5.4-nano Confidence: 0.95 Result: passed
Voting opened
2025-05-26
Voting closed
2025-06-02
IPR review ends
2025-07-02
Discussion opened
2025-05-19
Discussion closed
2025-05-26

AI-generated from the CABF ballot page. The official CABF article remains the authoritative source.

Vote result

Certificate Issuers 15 yes 0 no 1 abstain
Certificate Consumers 2 yes 0 no 0 abstain

CABF ballot approval depends on both voting classes; CA votes alone are not decisive.

17 Yes
0 No
1 Abstain

94% yes · 0% no · 6% abstain

Proposers

Stephen Davidson (DigiCert) and endorsed by Stefan Selbitschka (rundQuadrat) and Guillaume Amringer (Carillon).

Excerpt

SearchHome » All CA/Browser Forum Posts » Ballot SMC012: Introduce ACME for S/MIMEBallot SMC012: Introduce ACME for S/MIMEThe Intellectual Property Review (IPR) period for Ballot SMC012 (Ballot SMC012: Introduce ACME for S/MIME) has completed.

View on cabforum.org → Last fetched 15 hours ago

We use only essential cookies and local browser storage for preferences and security. See our Privacy Policy for details.

Confirm action