← Disig, a.s. cases
Bugzilla #1717001
Ca Documents
Disig: CPS does not refer to BR domain validation methods
RESOLVED
INVALID
Disig, a.s.
This summary was auto-generated by AI and revised by me when needed — accuracy improves with each update.
Always refer to the official Bugzilla thread as the authoritative source.
If you spot an inaccuracy, let me know via the contact form.
AI Summary
Disig, a.s. was notified of an ambiguity in their Certificate Practice Statement (CPS) regarding compliance with the Baseline Requirements (BR) for domain validation methods. The issue was raised by a third party, prompting Disig to acknowledge the problem and commit to updating their CPS. Disig confirmed that the ambiguity did not affect the issuance of certificates and provided a timeline for the resolution, which included publishing a revised CPS. The updated CPS was released on June 18, 2021, addressing the identified issues.
Chronology
- Disig acknowledges the ambiguity in their CPS and commits to updating it.
- Disig publishes an updated version of their CPS.
Thread Activity
- Fozzie representative — Reported that Disig's CPS does not refer to the BR domain validation methods.
- Disig, a.s. — Acknowledged the notification and stated that the CPS would be updated.
- Disig, a.s. — Announced the publication of the updated CPS version 5.6.
- Mozilla representative — Created an issue to track the ambiguity in CP/CPS in the MRSP.
Participants
Fozzie representative
Disig, a.s.
Community commenter
Mozilla representative
External References
Similar Local Cases
SECOM: CP/CPS does not clearly specify domain validation methods
Camerfirma: CP/CPS of Intesa Sanpaolo Sub-CA is Non-Compliant
SECOM: FUJIFILM intermediate CA Certificate not listed in audit statement
Camerfirma: No disclosure of verification sources
FNMT: CP/CPS lack CAA processing details
NETLOCK: Intermediate CA Certificate not disclosed to CCADB
NETLOCK: Findings in 2024 Audit
Entrust: Not updating CPR Problem Reporting Mechanism fields in CCADB